Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ed Bradford's avatar

Excellent article and insight into "equality/equity".

I never thought about just stating the problem,

rather than both the problem and the solution

in the same sentence. What an obvious observation.

Similar to logical fallacies concerning a premise,

I can now, with your insight, declare

"I agree with the need but I deny your

solution (conclusion)"

There are many more conclusions than

the one offered.

Expand full comment
David Williams's avatar

This approach allows for compromise and creation. It is the opposite of polarizing ideology. Ed, in his comment, shows the solution I’ve been saying for years. First let’s agree on a subject. Let’s take one you mentioned. Resolved: In a nation like ours, a land of wealth and opportunity, no person should be unable to afford medical care. Medical security is a necessity to be able to enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?”

Now. Let’s argue about the best methods to bring this about. Neither the 100% private care nor the 100% Government care will get what they want. Each side gives to the greater middle who find the compromise that achieves the goal. The goals can be measured. No person shall spend more than x% of the family take home income, etc. First, start from a place of agreement, then work towards that agreement.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts