In the early years of the Cold War, American policymakers had one nightmare above all. To be sure, they publicly fretted that Stalin would send the Red Army into western Europe and impose communism there. But what they really worried about was that some of the western Europeans would choose communism in democratic elections.
Against a military onslaught America could fight militarily, as it had fought against fascism. And it could do so honorably in the name of democracy. But how could a democracy deny another democracy the right to choose its own government, even if a communist one?
The answer supplied by Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower was covert warfare. In 1948 Truman’s Central Intelligence Agency manipulated Italian elections through disinformation and secret contributions to anticommunist candidates. The effort succeeded and the communists were kept from power. In 1953 Eisenhower turned the CIA loose against the elected Iranian government of Muhammad Mussadiq, who was insufficiently anticommunist for Eisenhower's taste. The coup succeeded and Mussadiq was replaced by the staunchly anticommunist shah of Iran.
In each case, democracy was sacrificed to expediency. American interest overrode the right of Italians and Iranians to choose their own governments without foreign meddling.
This conclusion isn't indefensible. Democracy is an important value, but it's not the only value in politics and international affairs. Yet it's telling that the conclusion was not defended at the time. Truman and Eisenhower declined to acknowledge their antidemocratic policies.
This brief history is worth considering at a moment when one of America's two major parties is taking essentially the same view regarding politics within the United States. By renominating Donald Trump for president, the Republicans are endorsing his argument that he really won the election of 2020. If there’s a fundamental principle of democracy, it’s that the results of elections must be binding on winners and losers alike. Anyone who disputes the result of an election bears the burden of producing evidence of error or fraud. Persistent denial, absent persuasive evidence, reveals the denier as no friend of democracy.
As observed, there are other values than democracy. Republican supporters of Trump evidently prioritize those other values. America is a free country, and this is their right. But if they're not willing to state their priorities openly, the rest of us are justified in wondering what else they're not telling us.
Many Republicans seem to think Joe Biden is such a threat to the American way of life that extralegal measures were justified to deny him office. Trump has treated as heroes his supporters who attacked Congress in January 2021 to overturn Biden’s election. What else do he and they have up their sleeves?
Occasionally Republicans note that democracy isn't mentioned in the Constitution, and from this they infer that the United States is not a democracy. They're right about the Constitution. But American practice has changed since the Constitution was written, and by modern standards the United States is indeed a democracy.
The Republican skeptics can still say the United States should not be a democracy. Here again, that's their right. But yet again, they ought to be candid about it. If they think they know better than voters how to choose a president, they should say so.
Anyway, even the skeptics of democracy agree that America was founded as a republic based on the rule of law. Election laws are central to the operation of any republic. Reject the results of elections and you undermine the republic.
This is how dictatorships begin. Inconvenient laws are ignored or overridden. Most supporters of Trump don't want him to be a dictator. They'd prefer he get his way by the methods of democracy. But they've made clear that if they have to choose between Trump and democracy, they'll choose him.
They've done so regarding the 2020 election, ineffectually thus far. If Trump falls short again this autumn, it’s unlikely he’ll concede. He’ll remain a sore loser. But Biden will remain president.
But if Trump wins, as appears increasingly probable, Americans as a group will have democratically elected an enemy of democracy.
The nightmare of presidents during the Cold War will have come true in America.
Brands writes: "the United States is indeed a democracy." I confess to being a cynic and a curmudgeon, but I feel we're in reality a plutocracy. I like what Joe (father of the Kennedys) Kennedy said when urging JFK to run for office. "Three things win elections: money, money, and money. And who has more of it to throw around than your old man?" Of course, money alone can't win an election. If it were, Michael Bloomberg would be president today. To phrase it in logical terms, it's a necessary condition without being a sufficient condition.
We are arguably still living with negative blowback of the CIA's intervention in Iran.
It is worth noting that many nations which were ostensibly democratic have slid into fascism and authoritarianism whether aided by outside intrigue or not. Most famous of course are Germany, Italy and Spain in the early 20th century. Then we have Argentina and Chili. Brazil has had their bit.
But in 230 years, we have seen nothing like we are seeing now with the modern Trump GOP. The denial of democracy using the tautology "we are a constitutional republic, not a democracy" argument tells you all you need to know.
The GOP is planning on creating a neo-fascist government should Trump win. Project 2025 lays it all out:
-recruit tens of thousands of conservatives to the District of Columbia to replace existing federal civil servants
-slashing funding for the Department of Justice (DOJ),
-dismantling the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
-sharply reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuel production,
-eliminating the Department of Commerce,
-ending the independence of federal agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
-Funding for climate research would be cut
-National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be reformed along conservative principles
-It promotes capital punishment and the speedy "finality" of those sentences.
"Jeffrey Clark, a contributor to the project and a former official within the DOJ, advises the future president to immediately deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and direct the DOJ to pursue Donald Trump's adversaries by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807"
"Paul Dans, the project's director, explained that Project 2025 is "systematically preparing to march into office and bring a new army, aligned, trained, and essentially weaponized conservatives ready to do battle against the deep state."
The whole plan is a christian autocratic nationalist theocratic movement - Jesus version of Iran. Then there's the Hillsdale College professor advocating a "Red Caesar". DeSantis in Florida has created his own brownshirt militia.
Democratic principles in the USA have never been more at risk than this year.
[1] https://www.project2025.org/
[2] https://www.salon.com/2023/10/09/the-rights-red-caesar-plan-a-new-order-keeps-marching-forward/