Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DENNIS B MURPHY's avatar

Quote: reasoning ability is more valuable than the mastery of mere information.

SO TRUE AND WELL SAID!

What really frustrates me in today's social media debate landscape is the lack of analysis behind the deployment of information (or facts, if you will).

I regularly see assertions put forth such as "The Democrats were the party of slavery" (or Jim Crow) as if that fact from 1860 through 1964 is relevant to a discussion of current political trends.

As always enjoying the insights of Mr Brands.

Expand full comment
Jim Guleke's avatar

“Fear not the bot”-ChatBots

After a month since originally reading Prof. Brands’ essay “Fear not the bot,” I have identified only two uses for artificially intelligent chatbots that might be beneficial to mankind: 1) When one can remember and describe a concept but cannot remember the name of the concept, because at a certain age some of the memory’s synaptic gaps are wider than the River Styx such that the neuron-to-neuron signaling process is slower than it used to be, one can describe to the chatbot the concept and ask that it recall the name. 2) When one is trying to write a piece on a subject but is stuck, inflicted with writer’s block, just by typing in a subject on the chatbot’s input line and watching the bot respond with apparent rapid ease, whether the content is accurate or not (and it often is not), seems to liberate the mind, giving a real author the ability to get started with putting ideas to paper, the originality, accuracy and veracity of which real authors attest to with their own reputations on the line each time they write. Perhaps other uses will come to mind later, before playing with the service becomes just a waste of time.

But because the user cannot tell the sources from which chatbot gathers its information, it bestows upon the user a sense of anonymity, much as does any chatroom or other form of “social media” in which the participants are removed from the real people with whom they are communicating. I submit this is a false sense of power, stripping the user of inhibitions, spurring the user to do things that they would otherwise not think of doing. And therein lies its danger. It divorces one’s actions from a sense of one’s accountability. What would Camu say about that?

By analogy, another danger may be looming on the horizon. Launched by the United States Department of Defense in 1973 and given to mankind in 1983 by Executive Order of President Ronald Reagan, the United States Global Positioning System (GPS) has been received and used as a substitute for remembering how to get to places, including home, office, school and grocery store. The National Institute of Health questioned its benefit to mankind when it noted in an article published in 2021 that GPS navigation was “commonplace in everyday life. While it has the capacity to make our lives easier, it is often used to automate functions that were once exclusively performed by our brain. Staying mentally active is key to healthy brain aging. Therefore, is GPS navigation causing more harm than good?” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032695/ (retrieved March 17, 2023). Earlier, Nature, in an April 14, 2020 article, had suggested that “habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation... which critically relies on the hippocampus.” After assessing “... the lifetime GPS experience of 50 regular drivers as well as various facets of spatial memory, including spatial memory strategy use, cognitive mapping, and landmark encoding using virtual navigation task ...,” concluding that “those who used GPS more did not do so because they felt they had a poor sense of direction, suggesting that extensive GPS use led to a decline in spatial memory rather than the other way around.” Louisa Dahmani, Louisa and Bohbot, Véronique D., Nature, “Scientific Reports,” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62877-0 (retrieved March 17, 2023).

So maybe my suggestion number 1 above as to the usefulness of using artificially intelligent chatbots to recall names of concepts may be more detrimental than beneficial. And maybe we should all be mindful of the words of the Hippocratic Oath: “first, do no harm.” (Or was quote not from his “Oath,” but from his “Of the Epidemics,” I forget. Possibly, it takes only a month of using chatbots to dull the brain, or at least mine.)

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts